![]() ![]() Popular with the military as a one-size-fits-all diagnostic, by 1946 the Rorschach had achieved such name recognition that it was featured onscreen in La La Land. In addition to such unforeseen results, the Rorschach could also produce wayward readings due to varying criteria that were considered vague. Social historian Stephen Birmingham wrote of how in 1930s New York Jewish high society, the Rorschach was administered as a parlor game with added Yiddishkeit.Īt one such get-together, Hattie Lehman Goodhart, a noted hostess, took the test conducted by a young psychologist from California, who concluded that she “was an antisemite!” of instantly trying to discern antisemitism in the impassive faces of strangers, might have especially relished revelations hidden in otherwise undefined shapes. These intellectuals, many with experience in Fascist Europe and the U.S. I enjoyed the impromptu seminars, the unscheduled luncheons, and the small parties.”įor these doctors, the Rorschach test was something to schmooze about. I vividly remember the excitement in the planning of the exchange and the institute, the merging of ideas and disciplines, the enthusiasms, the stimulating discussions, and yes, the controversies. “A remarkable group assembled around Klopfer. ![]() Hertz described the blot-obsessed Kaffeeklatsch atmosphere: Since the 1930s, Hertz averred, she was “happily wedded to the Rorschach, although at times I have been forced by circumstances or drawn by other interests into temporary separation.”īeyond symbolic wedlock, attachment to the Rorschach test forged social circles among Jewish therapists. Jews propounding the Rorschach approach in the early years, as Marguerite Hertz recalled in 1986, shared a sense of emotional involvement. Later studies have included the “Jewish star” or Star of David among possible shapes to be identified in the images, and one guidebook suggests that a non-Jewish patient finding a shofar in a blot represents an identification “from a culture or historical context different from the examinee’s current context.” 2003 2(2):142-146.So Rorschach’s work records cite a typical response that some shapes resemble “nothing but the eternal Jew in Judea,” with the parenthetical note: “Gray heads… which are frequently interpreted as Jewish profiles.” What’s right with the Rorschach? The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. ![]() Watkins CE, Campbell VL, Nieberding R, Hallmark R. Hermann Rorschach: From klecksography to psychiatry. History and directory: Society for Personality Assessment fiftieth anniversary. Rorschach inkblot test and psychopathology among patients suffering from schizophrenia: A correlational study. Essentials of Rorschach assessment: Comprehensive system and R-PAS. ![]() Call for a Moratorium on the Use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in Clinical and Forensic Settings. The validity of individual Rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Mihura JL, Meyer GJ, Dumitrascu N, Bombel G. The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: a critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Wood JM, Lilienfeld SO, Garb HN, Nezworski MT. SIS Journal of Projective Psychology & Mental Health. Revisiting the Rorschach Controversy: The Rorschach Test- A Ghost of the Past or a Bearer of further promise?. Validity of Rorschach Inkblot scores for discriminating psychopaths from nonpsychopaths in forensic populations: A meta-analysis. Wood JM, Lilienfeld SO, Nezworski MT, Garb HN, Allen KH, Wildermuth JL. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |